Cambridge Pays $389K Restitution, $200K FINRA Fine in Reg BI UIT Case

Independent broker-dealer Cambridge Investment Research Inc. has been censured and fined $200,000 by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority after the regulator found the firm failed to adequately supervise a registered representative who repeatedly recommended that customers sell unit investment trusts, or UITs, before their maturity dates, racking up nearly $390,000 in unnecessary costs for 184 retail clients over nearly three years.

The enforcement action, formalized through a letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent, or AWC, covers conduct from June 30, 2020, through February 2023. Cambridge, a FINRA member since December 1995, operates approximately 2,800 branch offices and employs roughly 4,900 registered representatives.

The case centers on a now-terminated representative whose UIT trading activity generated an outsized share of the firm’s internal compliance alerts. Although his recommendations accounted for only about 10% of Cambridge’s total UIT business, they produced roughly 60% of all firm-wide trade alerts for early UIT rollovers during his tenure.

UITs are SEC-registered investment vehicles that hold a fixed portfolio of securities and terminate on a specified maturity date, typically after 15 or 24 months. They carry meaningful upfront costs – including deferred sales charges of 1.35% to 2.30%, a 0.5% creation and development fee, and organization costs of 0.25% to 0.75%. When a customer holds a UIT to maturity, those costs are spread across the full investment period; when a representative recommends early redemption and reinvestment into a new UIT, the costs compound. A customer who cycled through three UITs in a 15-month window, for example, could pay sales charges of 6.45% or more, versus roughly 2.15% for a single buy-and-hold position.

The representative’s customers sold 90% of their UIT positions before maturity, typically rolling proceeds directly into new UITs. On average, customers held their UITs for only 56% of their term lengths. Collectively, those recommendations caused 184 customers to incur at least $389,200.62 in costs they would not have faced had they held their positions to maturity.

The Cambridge case is notable not only for the representative’s conduct but for the extended period during which internal warnings went unheeded. As early as June 2020, supervisory personnel had begun escalating concerns — both about the volume of alerts the representative was generating and about the vague justifications he provided for his recommendations. By May 2021, compliance staff had separately flagged his pattern of selling UITs well ahead of their maturity dates.

Despite these repeated escalations, FINRA said the firm failed to take meaningful action. Supervisors did not challenge the representative’s stated rationales, nor did they conduct a substantive evaluation of the added costs his recommendations were imposing on customers. Cambridge’s supervisory system, while capable of generating alerts, was not backed by a sufficiently rigorous investigative response, FINRA found.

It was not until January 2023, when compliance personnel escalated directly to senior compliance leadership, that Cambridge took decisive action, conducting a formal investigation and terminating the representative the following month. FINRA has separately barred the representative from the securities industry for failing to respond to a Rule 8210 request for information.

FINRA acknowledged Cambridge’s proactive steps once the firm did act. Before regulators launched their own inquiry, Cambridge had terminated the representative, engaged an outside consultant to calculate customer harm, and voluntarily paid $389,200.62 in restitution to all 184 affected customers in April 2023. Those steps were credited in determining the final sanctions, which consisted of the censure and the $200,000 fine.

Reg BI Dimension

The case is also an early example of FINRA enforcement directly tied to Regulation Best Interest’s care obligation. Reg BI took effect on June 30, 2020 — the start date of the violation period cited in the AWC. Under the care obligation, broker-dealers must exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill to ensure that recommendations are in the best interest of retail customers. Cambridge’s failure to supervise the representative’s UIT churn, FINRA found, meant the firm was not meeting that standard.

Cambridge Investment Research, headquartered in Fairfield, Iowa, operates Cambridge Investment Research Advisors Inc., a large corporate registered investment adviser.

Visit the AltsWire directory page.